Last Updated: Friday - 09/24/2010
February 2, 2009
Vatican wants warm relations with Obama
Holy See's diplomats hope new U.S. president will work for peace
BY JOHN THAVIS
CATHOLIC NEWS SERVICE
VATICAN CITY — The Vatican has struck a predominantly positive tone as it opens relations with the administration of President Barack Obama, emphasizing hopes for cooperation on issues of peace and social justice.
While registering its disappointment over an early presidential decision to restore funding to programs that offer abortion overseas, the Vatican has avoided pre-emptive battles with Obama over pro-life and family issues.
Pope Benedict sent an Inauguration Day telegram congratulating the new president and supporting Obama’s resolve to “promote understanding, cooperation and peace among the nations.”
The Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, compared the swearing-in of the first African-American president to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and said it ushered in a new era of expectation and participation.
But beyond these optimistic public declarations, what are the Vatican’s top concerns at the start of the Obama term? What are its highest hopes and its deepest worries?
MIDDLE EAST PEACE
In interviews over recent weeks, Vatican officials said their expectations were highest on international questions of war and peace — most specifically, the Israeli-Palestinian war.
What is expected of the Obama administration, they said, is a decisive initiative to restart the peace process and move it toward a definitive solution, not a one-shot attempt but a “consistent commitment” to lead Israelis and Palestinians to the realization that a settlement is in their own best interests.
Vatican diplomats were disappointed at the Bush administration’s peace-promoting efforts in the Holy Land. They said those efforts came late and that the most promising initiative — the peace conference in Annapolis, Md., in late 2007 — was not followed up with diplomatic pressure.
While no one expects Obama to alter the United States’ fundamental support for Israel, Vatican officials said the new president begins his term with a certain amount of trust and sympathy among Arabs. That could be important, they said, because Arabs need to feel they have a world leader who takes their situation to heart.
Already, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s recent statement that the new administration would move quickly to diplomatically engage Syria and Iran was seen as a wise move by the Vatican.
WAR ON TERRORISM
The Vatican always was uncomfortable with the Bush administration’s self-proclaimed “war on terrorism,” even though officials gave qualified support to U.S. military action against terrorist enclaves in Afghanistan in 2001.
Vatican sources said the hope is that the anti-terrorism effort under Obama will be carried out with two principles in mind: first, respect for legal rights, that is, a rejection of torture; and, second, attention to the underlying causes of terrorism, including injustice and political frustration.
On economic issues, Vatican officials cited potential areas of agreement with Obama, including his concern for those on the margins of society.
The hope, they said, is that the president’s stated concern for the poor in the United States will translate into a serious U.S. commitment to help alleviate global poverty. This was an important area of cooperation with the Bush administration, and the Vatican wants it to continue under Obama.
On pro-life issues, Vatican officials said they hoped Obama, who is seen as an intelligent politician, would not pick unnecessary fights with the church. Although it was expected, the Vatican reacted quickly to the president’s executive order Jan. 23 to remove a ban on federal aid to programs that promote or perform abortion overseas.
“A very disappointing decision,” read the headline in the Vatican newspaper, quoting from a reaction statement from U.S. bishops.
Archbishop Rino Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, told an Italian newspaper that “if this is one of President Obama’s first acts, I have to say, with all respect, that we’re a short step away from disappointment.”
Fisichella noted the massive participation in the Jan. 22 March for Life in Washington. If Obama’s response is to extend the right of abortion, he said, that seems to contradict the president’s own remarks about defending human dignity. “But we shall see,” he added.
Pro-life and family issues are not merely U.S. domestic affairs. Vatican diplomats know that questions regarding population control, bioethics, the family and even homosexuality increasingly come up for debate in international forums, including the United Nations.
While the Vatican and the Bush administration were in close agreement on such topics, there is apprehension about the policies of the Obama administration — and how hard it will push those policies.
For these and many other reasons, the Vatican is closely watching for Obama’s choice of a new U.S. ambassador to the Vatican. An early appointment would be viewed at the Vatican as a sign of the president’s interest and attention to the Holy See.
The choice of ambassador is, of course, up to the president. One informed Vatican official dismissed an earlier report that the Vatican, in a nod toward conservative Catholics, might veto the appointment of a high-profile Catholic supporter of Obama.
Rejecting an ambassador for those kinds of political motives is not in the tradition of Vatican diplomacy and would be dangerous, the official said.
Many at the Vatican are already looking ahead to an expected meeting between Obama and Pope Benedict later this year.
Although the Vatican understands that the young president has a lot on his plate as he comes into office, they are eager to see him in Rome. Asked when he hoped it would happen, one Vatican official said, “As soon as possible.”