WCR logo
 

Saturday - 05/18/2013

Click for Edmonton City Centre, Alberta Forecast

St. Paul - Mundare St. Paul
Jubilee
2008-2009
Catechism Logo Exploring the
Catholic Catechism
Compendium-Cover
Compendium
of the
Social Doctrine
of the Church

Last Updated: Friday - 09/24/2010


Week of November 5, 2007


Dialogue remarks trouble Muslims

Vatican official doubts possibility of discussing Muslims' Quran


By CINDY WOODEN
Catholic News Service
Vatican City


After 138 Muslim scholars wrote to top Christian leaders highlighting shared religious values as a basis for working together for peace and understanding, a Vatican official raised questions about the possibilities for dialogue with Muslims.

Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, the longtime Vatican diplomat who became president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue in September, has said the Vatican would respond formally to the Muslim scholars.

But he raised concerns among the Muslim signers when he told a French Catholic newspaper he was not sure "theological dialogue" was possible with Muslims.

The newspaper, La Croix, asked the cardinal if theological dialogue was possible with members of other religions.

Dictated by God

"With some religions, yes," he said. "But with Islam, no, not at this time. Muslims do not accept the possibility of discussing the Quran, because it is written, they say, as dictated by God.

"With such a strict interpretation, it is difficult to discuss the content of faith."

Aref Ali Nayed, one of the original signers of the letter and senior adviser to the Cambridge Interfaith Program at Britain's Cambridge University divinity faculty, told Catholic News Service, "Cardinal Tauran's statement to La Croix was very disappointing indeed."

'Deeply discouraging'

Nayed, who has taught at the Pontifical Institute for Arabic and Islamic Studies in Rome, said the cardinal's comment "deeply discouraged Muslim scholars and annoyed many Muslim believers at the grassroots level."

"Rather than unilaterally declaring the impossibility of theological dialogue with Muslims, Cardinal Tauran would have been wiser to ask Muslim scholars themselves as to what kind of dialogue they feel is possible, from their point of view."

He said Muslim scholars always have been "aware of the fact that the activities of interpretation, understanding and exegesis of God's eternal discourse" are human activities that must be renewed in every age.

"Solemn belief in the eternity and divine authorship of the Quran never prevented Muslim scholars from dealing with it historically and linguistically," he said.

"On the contrary, belief in the revelatory truth of the Quran was the very motivation for spending lifetimes in close scholarly study of God's discourse."

Obviously, there is a difference between theological and ethical dialogue, Nayed said, but people who believe their faith provides "the ultimate fount and ground for righteous living" are not acting as believers when they separate the two.

"If religious, revelation-based communities are to truly contribute to humanity, their dialogue must be ultimately theologically and spiritually grounded," Nayed said. "If dialogue is to be serious, it must be theologically and spiritually deep."

Jesuit Father Daniel Madigan, of Georgetown University in Washington, told CNS that many Christians misunderstand how Muslims view the Quran, leading to a widespread prejudice that assumes "Muslims are unwilling or incapable of interpreting the Quran."

'Extensive interpretation'

The truth is that "there is a very extensive Muslim literature of Quran interpretation, both traditional and contemporary," said Madigan, who serves as a consultant to the commission for relations with Muslims at the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue.

"Any act of reading is an act of interpretation: Some Muslims read the Quran as warranting violence, while others do not interpret it that way," he said. "Some think it requires the seclusion of women; many others disagree.

"The fact that there are different interpretations is a starting point for dialogue," Madigan said.

"At a time when a substantial group of Muslim scholars of widely varying persuasions is trying publicly to promote a theological dialogue with Christians, it seems imprudent to rule out the very possibility of such an engagement," he said.

Second Vatican Council

The Jesuit said the basis for theological dialogue with Muslims was affirmed by the Second Vatican Council in its document on relations with other religions and in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, which said Christians and Muslims "adore the one, merciful God."

Abdal Hakim Murad Winter, an original signer of the letter to Christian leaders, said, "Infallibility is an occasion for dialogue, not an obstacle."

The fact Christians and Muslims each have sincere beliefs does not mean that they cannot be "theologically challenged by others," he said.

The Muslims who wrote the letter have launched a website - www.acommonword.com.


Copyright © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 -- Western Catholic Reporter


Our mission: To serve our readers by bringing the Gospel to bear on current issues in the Church and in secular culture through accurate news coverage and reflective commentary.