|
|||||||||
|
Last Updated: Friday - 09/24/2010Week of September 3, 2007Toxic trade produces popular toxic toysBecome an educated consumer for the sake of your family's health
Your EarthBy SUZANNE ELSTONThe recent recall of nearly 900,000 Mattel Inc. products was the second major recall of dangerous toys in August. This most recent involved popular items including a variety of Doggie Day Care, Polly Pocket, Barbie and Tanner and Batman toys, as well as "Sarge" die cast cars. The toys were pulled off the shelf because of concerns about lead paint poisoning and a choking hazard due to small magnets coming loose. The earlier recall was for Fisher-Price toys, which included an assortment of Dora the Explorer and Sesame Street toys. Once again, the concern was that the hard surfaces of the toys could contain excessive levels of lead. Chinese importsIn every case, the toys were manufactured in China, which has prompted critics to accuse the government of failing to protect Canadian consumers. In question are Canada's Environmental Protection Act and the Hazardous Products Act, both of which are badly in need of updating. Canada's Lead Reduction Strategy, which falls under the jurisdiction of Health Canada, was reviewed a decade ago, but none of the six original objectives of the review have been met, according to the Canadian Environmental Law Association's Kathy Cooper. Canada's auditor general has been critical of the federal government's failure to protect its citizens since 1997. In 1999, Canada's commissioner of the environment and sustainable development, Brian Emmett, said, "Understanding the risks posed by toxic substances is the first step toward protecting Canadians. But the federal government's knowledge of their effects is incomplete and the risks are still unknown. "Furthermore, the departments responsible for managing the risks are themselves deeply divided on how it should be done. They even disagree on the importance of the risks." Three years later in 2002, Emmett's successor, Johanne Gelinas, warned that the management of toxic substances remained inadequate. Five years later, millions of toys that are readily available on store shelves have been identified as potential toxic health hazards to the most vulnerable of citizens - our children. While the government has an undeniable responsibility to protect its citizens, those citizens have an inherent responsibility to become discriminating about what they buy and where they buy it. The problem is that consumers have been seduced by the cheap availability of just about everything, thanks to global trade and retailing giants like Wal-Mart. The world's largest corporation and biggest retailer got that way by relying heavily on the cheap labour and lower environmental standards in China, where a whopping 70 per cent of Wal-Mart's goods are made. Wal-Mart's marketplaceIn 2004 alone this translated into $18 billion worth of goods. "If Wal-Mart were an individual economy," said Xu Jun, Wal-Mart China's director of external affairs in China Business Weekly, "it would rank as China's eighth-biggest trading partner, ahead of Russia, Australia and Canada." This is the very same China that is notorious for its human rights violations and environmental practices. According to a briefing document, China's Environmental Crisis, prepared by the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, "Sixteen of the world's 20 most polluted cities are in China." One third of China's population lacks access to clean drinking water, thanks to industrial pollution. With its heavy dependence on fossil fuels, China is poised to overtake the United States as the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases. If Canadians are really concerned about toxic toys and other potential health threats posed by consumer goods, then they need to take a Latin lesson. Caveat emptor - "Let the buyer beware" - has never been more relevant. Everyday low prices are just a small part of the real cost we pay for buying cheap consumer goods. Related websites:
|
||||||||
Copyright © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 -- Western Catholic ReporterOur mission: To serve our readers by bringing the Gospel to bear on current issues in the Church and in secular culture through accurate news coverage and reflective commentary. |
|||||||||