Last Updated: Friday - 09/24/2010
Week of June 19, 2000
What makes for a practising Christian?
By FR. RON ROLHEISER, omi
There's a national phone-in show on radio in Canada that I try to catch whenever I can. Recently its topic for discussion was: Why do so few people go to church today?
The question triggered a spirited response. Some called in and said that the churches were emptying because they were too progressive, too sold-out to the culture, too devoid of old, timeless truth. These calls would invariably be followed by others that suggested exactly the opposite, namely, that the churches are emptying because they are too slow to change, too caught up in old traditions that no longer make sense.
And so it went on, caller after caller, until one man suggested that the real issue was not whether the Church was too progressive or regressive. Rather, in his view, fewer and fewer people were going to church because "basically people treat their churches exactly the way they treat their own families; they want them around, but they don't go home to visit them all that much."
The comment reminded me of Reginald Bibby, the sociologist of religion, who likes to quip: "People aren't leaving their churches, they just aren't going to them - and that is a difference that needs to be understood."
Indeed it does. There is a difference between leaving a family and just not showing up regularly for its celebrations. This distinction in fact needs to shape the way we answer a number of important questions: Who belongs to the Church? What makes for a practising Christian? When is someone's relationship to the Church mortally terminated? What does it mean to be outside the Church?
As well, this distinction impacts on the question as to who is entitled to receive the rites of Baptism, Eucharist, Confirmation, marriage and Christian burial.
People are treating their churches like they treat their families. Isn't that as it should be? Theologically the Church is family - it's not like family, it is family.
A good ecclesiology then has to look to family life to properly understand itself (the reverse of course is also true). Now if we place the questions we just posed within the context of family life, we have there, I believe, the best perspective in which to answer them.
Thus, inside of our families: Who is in and who is out? When does someone cease being a "practising" member of a family? Does someone cease to be a member of a family because he or she doesn't come home much any more? Do we refuse to give a wedding for a son or daughter just because he or she, caught up in youth and self-interest, hasn't come home the last couple of years for Easter and Christmas? Not exactly abstract questions!
Many of us have children and siblings who for various reasons, at this stage of their lives, largely use the family for their own needs and convenience. They want the family around, but on their terms. They want the family for valued contact at key moments (weddings, births of children, funerals, anniversaries, birthdays and so on) but they don't want a relationship to it that is really committed and regular.
A lot of families are like that. They understand this, accept it, swallow hard sometimes and remain a family despite it. In any extended family, it's natural that, while everyone is a member of the family, there will be different levels of participation. Some will give more, others will take more.
Some, by virtue of maturity, will carry most of the burden - they will arrange the dinners, pay for them, keep inviting the others, do most of the work, and take on the task of trying to preserve the family bond and ethos. Others, because of youthful restlessness, immaturity, self-interest, confusion, peer pressure, laziness, anger, whatever, will carry less, take the family for granted, and buy in largely on their own terms.
That describes most families and is also a pretty accurate description of most churches. There are different levels of participation and maturity, but there is only one Church and that Church, like any family, survives precisely because some members are willing to carry more of the burden than others.
Those others, however, except for more exceptional circumstances, do not cease being members of the family. They ride on the grace of the others, literally. It's how family works; how grace works; how Church works.
Church must be understood as family: Certain things can put you out of the family, true. However, in most families, simple immaturity, hurt, confusion, distraction, laziness, youthful sexual restlessness and self-preoccupation - the reasons why most people who do not go to church stay away - do not mortally severe your connection.
You remain a family member. You don't cease being "a practising member" of the family because for a time you aren't home very much. Families understand this. Ecclesial family, Church, I believe, needs to be just as understanding.