|
||||||||
|
Last Updated:Friday - 09/24/2010March 31, 2003
WCR Letters to the Editor
Lecture coverage questionedHow odd it is that Ramon Gonzalez in his article on Father Thomas O'Meara's Jordan Lecture Series actually has a sub-title which reads "Three lectures." It is odd since his article says nothing about the content of the three lectures. For about four hours, Father O'Meara gave a balanced and thoughtful presentation of Christian ministry in the early Church (based mainly on St. Paul's letters), in subsequent history and in our contemporary Church situation. Not once during these three talks did Father O'Meara question or contradict the Church's teaching on ordained and non-ordained ministry. The article by Mr. Gonzalez deals with Father O'Meara's response to the last question asked after the third talk, which took up about two minutes of the speaker's time. The issue is not whether Father O'Meara said what he did concerning married priests and the ordination of women. He did. To say, however, that he "lashed out at the Vatican for banning discussion on the ordination of women" is simply not true. He did not "lash out," but expressed his disagreement calmly and with respect. The real issue is this: instead of presenting the material of Father O'Meara's lectures in a way that would deepen readers' faith understanding, as well as promote fruitful dialogue and unity within the Church, Mr. Gonzalez opted for the facile and fashionable route that promotes polarization and superficial controversy. His coverage of the Jordan Lecture Series can only be characterized as a flagrant distortion. Don H. MacDonald, ofm
|
|||||||
Copyright © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 -- Western Catholic ReporterOur mission: To serve our readers by bringing the Gospel to bear on current issues in the Church and in secular culture through accurate news coverage and reflective commentary. |
||||||||