Last Updated:Friday - 09/24/2010
February 21, 2000
Hints of a sexual counter-revolution
SPECIAL TO THE WCR
An English friend of mine commented recently that "there are some liberals over here who are starting to get a hangover from their binge." Indeed what began with idealized hopes for the perfectibility of man has ended in a near-total cave-in of public morality and civility.
Affirmation of disordered sexuality is the quintessential litmus test of liberal political correctness. For the past 30 years or so anyone who dared utter a word against sexual freedom has been contemptuously dismissed as a moral fascist or religious fanatic. It became inconceivable in liberal culture that virginity, abstinence, chastity or celibacy could have any possible individual or social merit.
Received conventional wisdom dictates that sexual "repression" is unhealthy, and that sexual promiscuity signalizes liberation from outmoded and oppressive values.
The pandemics of sexually transmitted disease that emerged in the '70s and '80s took considerable wind out of the sexual revolution's sails, but perhaps even more so the fact that once the veils of mystery are torn away from the sexual act, it quickly becomes banal - a routine bodily function, demanding ever greater degrees of perverse titillation to keep interest from flagging. Sex gets to be a bore.
So it's not completely surprising to hear that a new wave of sexual conservatism is washing over France, of all places. According to a recent survey by the French National Centre for Scientific Research, the average age at which young French people lost their virginity is nearly 18 overall, and 20 for middle-class individuals. (The average age for loss of virginity in Canada is 16.6 years, a full year earlier than the global average of 17.6).
The institution of marriage is also enjoying a renaissance in France, with 400,000 weddings expected in France this year as compared with 280,000 in 1999, and the divorce rate falling for the first time in 30 years.
While these trends don't exactly signalize a return to traditional Christian morality, they do appear to mark a turning of the tide - an opening of the liberal mind to the now-novel concept that there is perhaps some reward in virtue after all.
What drives one to the brink of despair is the legions of supposedly responsible adults who insist (and presumably believe) that "preaching" abstinence is both naive and futile, and that it is neither correct nor effective for society to set objective standards.
For example, the 1998 MacLean's year-end survey found that 27 per cent of Canadian parents (57 per cent in Quebec) would be willing to allow an 18-year-old daughter or son to have sex in the home with a steady partner.
These panderers of promiscuity earnestly blabber about "presenting teen sexuality in a positive light," and the "need" for young people to "express their sexuality without feeling it is wrong." Then they seem bewildered that despite their cherished sex education programs, Canada's teen pregnancy rate was 47.4 per 1,000 in 1995, up from 41.1 in 1987, rising every year during the period except 1995.
They just don't get it that learning to impose ordered restraint on sexual behaviour was one of humanity's most substantive steps toward civilization. All major religions and enduring cultures have recognized this. Conversely, societies that don't impose ordered limits on sexual expression don't advance, and ones that relax existing sexual mores soon suffer sharp decline - ancient Rome and Greece being exemplars.
A curious thing is that advocates of libertine sex are usually the same bunch who make emotional public statements demanding that "something be done" about the AIDS plague. They yammer on about how we need to spend more money on sex education to promote "safer sex," while caustically scorning the only bona fide safe sex modalities: abstinence before marriage and fidelity within it.
This amounts to a perverse and profoundly confusing message coming from people who in the next breath are liable to lapse into fevered stem-winding about "the tragedy of AIDS." Of course this apparent paradox is really just typical have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too humanist sentimentality colliding with liberal angst and guilt over unpleasant outcomes.
However, perhaps there's a scintilla of hope; the Maclean's poll found that while seven out of 10 respondents believed that Canadian attitudes towards sexual matters are becoming more permissive only 29 per cent of those who did thought this is a good thing.
Copyright © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 -- Western Catholic Reporter
Our mission: To serve our readers by bringing the Gospel to bear on current issues in the Church and in secular culture through accurate news coverage and reflective commentary.